This is a blog to share ideas... Feel free to jump on board and join me in my journey to grow through the exploration of new "ideas worth sharing"...
Friday, September 20, 2013
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Looking at Data in 3D
A brilliant way of looking at data and discovering potential linkages between what may initially look like unrelated topics!!!
Monday, September 9, 2013
"Same Angle, Different Lenses" Sustainability Series
Cross-Industry Analysis on the True Impacts of Sustainability:
A Refresher on Obsolescence and Greenwashingby
Isilay Civan, MSc, Ph.D.s, LEED AP
Senior consultant and the location leader for the HOK Chicago Consulting Group
(as published in http://bit.ly/13AtkzI)
In the September 2009 issue of the network, I identified
facilities as corporate assets that need to be regularly monitored for numerous
types of obsolescence (physical, economic, functional, technological, social,
legal/ political, and market), to reduce the risk of premature value
depreciation and loss of productivity. I suggested the (then) still rising
phenomenon of “green building” strategies as the potential structure for businesses
to utilize and green their built environments moving forward.
Four years later, this quarterly column will be analyzing the
topic of Sustainability from various angles. Even the harshest critics now
agree that the concept of sustainability is here to stay and the sooner you get
familiar with its true impacts, the better. Additionally, a virus I’ll call “FOBLO”
is fast spreading. What started as “FOMO” (Fear of Missing Out) in the social
media arena, has progressed into “FOBLO” (Fear of Being Left Out) in the
sustainability arena. Today, companies, regardless of industry, simply cannot
afford being left out and are under constant pressure to take some kind of
sustainability ‘steps’. Many of these claims are still borderline - greenwashing at best.
With enhanced (but still mostly voluntary) standards and guidelines paving the
way for ‘transparent’ and ‘accurate’ reporting and validation, there is an
increased need to understanding true sustainability and being able to distinguish
it from false claims. Another strong push may be the fact that, if you do not
start cleaning up your act now, your competitor may call you out on such issues
– especially in the ‘red ocean’ markets, where competition is fierce.
In subsequent issues, this column - a cross-industry analysis on
the true impacts of sustainability - will be entitled Same Angle, Different Lenses. But first, a refresher on The 7
Sins of Greenwashing by Terrachoice, part of the
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Global Network.
The Seven Sins
1 SIN OF THE HIDDEN TRADE-OFF
A claim suggesting that a product is ‘green’ based
on a narrow set of attributes without attention to other important
environmental issues.
Paper, for example, is not necessarily environmentally- preferable
just because it comes from a sustainably- harvested forest. Other important
environmental issues in the paper-making process, such as greenhouse gas
emissions, or chlorine use in bleaching may be equally important.
2 SIN OF NO PROOF
An environmental claim that cannot be substantiated
by easily accessible supporting information or by a reliable third-party
certification.
Common examples are facial tissues or toilet tissue products that
claim various percentages of post-consumer recycled content without providing
evidence.
3 SIN OF VAGUENESS
A claim that is so poorly defined or broad
that its real meaning is likely to be misunderstood by the consumer.
‘All-natural’ is an example. Arsenic, uranium, mercury, and formaldehyde are all naturally occurring, and poisonous. ‘All natural’ isn’t necessarily ‘green’.
4 SIN OF WORSHIPING FALSE
LABELS
A product that, through either words or
images, gives the impression of third-party endorsement where no such
endorsement exists.
Fake labels.
5 SIN OF IRRELEVANCE
An environmental claim that may be truthful but
is unimportant or unhelpful for consumers seeking environmentally preferable
products.
‘CFCfree’ is a common example, since it is a frequent claim despite
the fact that CFCs are banned by law.
6 SIN OF THE LESSER OF TWO
EVILS
A claim that may be true within the product category,
but that risks distracting the consumer from the greater environmental impacts
of the category as a whole.
Organic cigarettes are an example of this, as is the fuel-efficient sport-utility vehicle.
7 SIN OF FIBBING
Environmental claims that are simply false.
The most common examples were products falsely claiming to be
Energy Star certified or registered.
The Seven Sins cited above are still all-too-relevant and need to
be watched at every step of the way while pursuing sustainability; and hence, been
recited here once again as a cornerstone to all the topics that will appear in
this column. Expect the following subjects to appear in the upcoming Issues, in
no particular order that they may be written and/or come out, depicting the
various angles I will use to explore the subject of true sustainability:
- Real Estate Industry
- AEC Industry
- Facility Management Industry
- Urban Planning Perspective
- Legal Implications
- Technology Angle
- Healthcare Industry
- Aviation Industry
- Hospitality Industry
- Retail Industry
Please feel free to reach out to me at isilay.civan@hok.com for ideas/subject suggestions on any additional sustainability
issues which you would like us to explore.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)